Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 08:25:12 11/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2000 at 08:20:02, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 24, 2000 at 07:46:10, Fernando Villegas wrote: ><snipped> >>Why unfair? Only good critics are fair? > >It is unfair because the beta testers are not responsible for the fact that >tiger does not know to mate with bishop and knight. > Beta tester are not responsible of what a program brings or not, but I believe they are responsible to say what is lacking if it is important, as I believe b+n is. Anyway this is a matter of debate. But let the purcharser to decide if it is not important, NOT the beta tester, implicitly. Fernando >Saying that it is important to mate with bishop and knight and criticze tiger >for prefering to earn rating and not know this endgame is not unfair. > >I disagree with this statement but it is not unfair to say it. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.