Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 23:13:52 11/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2000 at 23:42:46, Bob Riley wrote: >On November 24, 2000 at 20:00:18, m.d.hurd wrote: > >>Can I say from the start that I think The tiger engine Will probably be number 1 >>in the SSDF rating list once testing begins ( until they perfect Fritz 7) and >>that I think this is in spite of, rather than due to the CP5 interface. If this >>was produced by chessbase it would not be percieved to be not a very good >>interface and would probably attract a lot of bad publicity for them. The number >>of features that do not work is quite high which is a shame. Hopefully this will >>be addressed by Rebel/Lokasoft and an update will be expedited. > >Mike, I was a beta tester for the Rebel 11 package. I assume that Ed and >Christophe and/or Lex saw your comments and will respond. You said that "The >number of featuress (in the GUI, I assume) that do not work is quite high.." >Can you be specific in identifying what features you have in mind here? That >could be helpful to review. Thank you. > >Bob Riley I also was a beta tester, and for one, annotating games does not work. It simple puts in the book used, and that is all.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.