Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:47:29 11/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2000 at 23:22:04, Christophe Theron wrote: >On November 24, 2000 at 17:02:11, Uri Blass wrote: > >>You can see in the Rebel board that the problem of infinite time is known. >> >>I found the problem when I analyzed a position for a long time. >> >>My experience is that the time is dependent on the position and I had examples >>when the time was less than 3 hours on my PIII450(192 mbyte hash) >> >>I had also an example when the time per move was more than 6 hours and in this >>case I did not try to check if the inifinite is finite. >> >>Uri > > > >Yes, I am sorry for this one. I have found the bug now, and it works OK. I have >a computer here that is computing on your position, Uri, since 69 hours and 30 >minutes and is still thinking (BTW it wants to play h4 at depth 21, score is >+0.38, now computing depth 22). > >I guess we will provide a free update to solve this issue. > > > > Christophe Thanks for the information. The position is from a game in the final of the championship of Israel in correspondence games. GM Abir Har Aven(ICCF rating 2585) is against me. Abir (white) started 1.g3 d5 2.f4 h5 3.Nf3 I already played h4 and it is Abir to move. I find that tiger plays h4 with the plan h4 Nxh4 Rxh4 but after giving tiger the position after h4 Nxh4 it wants to play e5 with a different score(more than +1 after a few minutes). I expect Abir to play Nxh4 and I will have to decide if to play e5 or Rxh4. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.