Author: Steve Maughan
Date: 08:58:47 11/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
Laurence, >Agreed, there's nothing odd about CM changing its mind. I believe that the so >called "bug" is not really a "bug", as CM searches deeper it changed its mind >with the previous evaluation, and that the move it intended to play 18. Nxc7 is >a mistake because of 18. ... Qe3+. The bug seems to be that it did not display >this evaluation as negative in the window, and instead it display the next best >move Raf1 with a score of 0.00. Hence, there's nothing odd with the choice made So I guess you don't beleive the PV. The only other program that does something similar is Rebel Tiger and that reduces the depth for the research - so I would still say that something different is going on Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.