Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:02:50 11/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2000 at 15:19:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 25, 2000 at 13:31:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: ><snipped> >>>>>Well,--crafty evaluate position at move 23. as better for white. >>>>>It plays 22...Qd7 to defend with Nb6/Nbc8/f5 which proofs to me >>>>>that Crafty has the potential to be the best program. With some >>>>>fine-tuning in its knowledge-base and book it should get there soon. >>>>>Keep it up! Bob (if I may use that name) >>>>>Regards,Kurt Widmann >>>> >>>>correct 21.Nf3 Qd7 not as above 22..Qd7 >>> >>>Crafty17.13's evaluation at moves 21-22(I used Crafty as a chessbase engine) >>>21.b3 0.40 for black at depth 10,-0.39 at depth 11 >>>21.Nxc4 0.37 for black at depth 11 >>> >>>After 21.Nf3 >>> >>>21...Qd7 0.54 for black at depth 10,0.59 for black at depth 11 >>> >>>After 21...Rc5 >>> >>>22.b3 0.59 pawns for black at depth 10 >>>22.Qe2 0.46 pawns for black at depth 10 >>> >>>I do not see positive scores for white >>> >>>Uri >> >>Don't forget this: we _must_ all get on the "same page" here. If you play >>crafty in "game mode" you will get significantly different scores than you >>do in "analysis mode". I don't know which of you is using what here. > >I used Crafty17.13 as chessbase engine in analysis mode. > >It can see 22.Ng5 with positive score after more time but not at the time >control that thorsten used. > >Uri That is the wrong way to find out what Crafty would _play_ in a game. analysis mode is non-asymmetric, which means the scores and variations will be a bit different. I +never+ test using analysis mode, for that reason. I only use it to kibitz analysis on ICC when two humans are playing.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.