Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:55:41 11/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2000 at 04:24:46, Severi Salminen wrote: >>>Not to offed, but you could have posted your three messages of same topic into >>>same thread, not as three separate threads. These are not _that_ important >>>announcements... >>> >>>Severi >> >> >>Is every message posted an important announcement?. >>Who makes the determination....you? > >I don't get your point. Daniel posted 3 times something about his internet >problems. I think he should have posted them to the same thread. It would have >been easier to follow the progress of his problems. > >>He can post as many new threads as he sees fit some here >>have expressed interest in watching his games and how he >>decides to post is his choice. > >Well, just to inform you also, we have this thread system because we could >follow certain topics easier. It has nothing to do with interest to his matches. >It is the same if everybody wants to read them or nobody, it is just a matter of >makeing things clearer. Maybe this place needs some basic rules as many still >don't know simple basics of posting to a forum or NG... > >Severi You are right that he should have posted this to one thread, but you aren't going to get a lot of support for the idea of "rules". bruce
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.