Author: Chessfun
Date: 10:34:17 11/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2000 at 12:55:41, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On November 26, 2000 at 04:24:46, Severi Salminen wrote: > >>>>Not to offed, but you could have posted your three messages of same topic into >>>>same thread, not as three separate threads. These are not _that_ important >>>>announcements... >>>> >>>>Severi >>> >>> >>>Is every message posted an important announcement?. >>>Who makes the determination....you? >> >>I don't get your point. Daniel posted 3 times something about his internet >>problems. I think he should have posted them to the same thread. It would have >>been easier to follow the progress of his problems. >> >>>He can post as many new threads as he sees fit some here >>>have expressed interest in watching his games and how he >>>decides to post is his choice. >> >>Well, just to inform you also, we have this thread system because we could >>follow certain topics easier. It has nothing to do with interest to his matches. >>It is the same if everybody wants to read them or nobody, it is just a matter of >>makeing things clearer. Maybe this place needs some basic rules as many still >>don't know simple basics of posting to a forum or NG... >> >>Severi > >You are right that he should have posted this to one thread, but you aren't >going to get a lot of support for the idea of "rules". Shoulda/woulda/coulda. There are no rules that state he should post to one thread. There are people who come here and post and have fun doing it. Daniel I think is one of them, to expect that he should follow more rules that don't even exist, after the recent blow-up over his headers is unfair. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.