Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: You must be a strong chess player to beat Tiger on its lowest level.

Author: stuart taylor

Date: 17:58:37 11/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2000 at 22:53:38, James T. Walker wrote:

>On November 25, 2000 at 19:07:36, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On November 25, 2000 at 09:21:42, James T. Walker wrote:
>>
>>>On November 25, 2000 at 08:07:49, Georg Langrath wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 25, 2000 at 06:02:42, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 25, 2000 at 04:21:59, Georg Langrath wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I have tried the lowest beginner level in Tiger against my Saitek Travel
>>>>>>Champion. Saitek on 20 seconds per move has no chance against Tigers lowest
>>>>>>beginner level. That means that Tigers lowest beginner level is at least 1600
>>>>>>SSDF Elo.  So you must be at least a good club player to have a chance against
>>>>>>Tiger. And to call the lowest level on Tiger beginner level is of course a joke.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Georg
>>>>>
>>>>>You might try the LokaSoft engine.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ed
>>>>
>>>>Yes, but why not Rebel Century 3 ? No other chess program has so good weakening
>>>>of levels as Rebel Century.
>>>>
>>>>Georg
>>>
>>>That's true Georg.  The thing I like about Rebel's low levels is it still uses
>>>time as if it is really thinking hard but plays down in strength.  This is
>>>unlike some engines which simply drop to 1 or 2 ply searches and move instantly
>>>every time.
>>>Jim
>>
>>Does it make intelligent mistakes? I mean great ideas which can be thwarted,
>>just like human would?
>>s.Taylor
>
>:-)  Intelligent mistakes? :>)  Is that an oxymoron?  I don't know.  I play it
>on the 1300 level sometimes and I can give it a good game but I still lose most
>of the time.
>Jim

There are some mistakes which only a great player could have made.
Actually, I think it would be MUCH more clever if a chess program could rate
your play not only according to the statistics of won/lost games, but also
according to the depth of your ideas, even if they are bad or losing moves, or
according to how much work it may have required to come up with a particular bad
move.
  And the computer should give an even higher score if it is apparent that you
thought of a great but wrong idea and rejected it.
S.Taylor



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.