Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:28:31 11/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 26, 2000 at 19:36:01, Daniel Chancey wrote: >Who thinks the rejected votes should've counted and who thinks that the >electorial college should go? > >This is 100% off topic and I apologize for this. > >Castle2000 1. Not only is the USA a land of 250 million people, it is _also_ a land of 50 states. The electoral college gives the small states a voice so that they are not overrun by a few large states. 2. All votes should be counted. But _only_ votes should be counted. Not ballots where you have to "imagine" what the intent of the voter actually was. IE dimples. Etc. A bunch of nonsense. If someone can't cast a vote properly, then perhaps their vote should not count. Voting is not rocket science. Not if kindergarden kids could use the same ballot as in West Palm Beach, and have _zero_ errors. Yes it is off-topic. But it is reasonably acceptable so long as it doesn't turn into an ugly argument...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.