Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:22:03 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 04:54:36, Torstein Hall wrote: >On November 27, 2000 at 04:24:02, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>If Rebel Tiger and Gambit Tiger are stronger and with Windows interface, why >>even install Rebel Century 3 for DOS? Just wondering... >> >>Jouni > >Rebel Century 3 has many nice features missing from the Tiger programs like EOC >etc. But the most important part is the playing style. Even if I much prefer >windows programs, Century 3 has a more human like style than Tiger, Fritz, >Crafty etc. Most programs feels like they are guided by search, playing >"unatural and ugly" variations. Century 3 play much more like a human GM!! > >Torstein It is better if you give examples to demonstrate what do you mean. I usually do not play against programs and I use them to analyze but I do not know what is the meaning of human like style. I would like to know something that is defined to say that Rebel plays more like humans. For example if you find that humans waste less tempos than most programs and Rebel also does the same then you can say that Rebel is more similiar to humans. I did not check if humans waste less tempos in games and this is only an example to a possible difference in playing style that can be defined clearly. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.