Author: Harald Faber
Date: 03:33:30 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 04:24:02, Jouni Uski wrote: >If Rebel Tiger and Gambit Tiger are stronger and with Windows interface, why >even install Rebel Century 3 for DOS? Just wondering... > >Jouni What makes you think that Century is weaker? How do you define "stronger"? Stronger in chess, stronger in playing comp-comp? IMO nowadays the believe in comp-comp and representing their chess strength is much too high. Personally I'd like to have accurate analysis, for playing even Fritz2/3 is strong enough to bust me. But I am sure my positional and strategical chess skills are much better. I lose "just" because I miss some tactics, preferably in time trouble. So do you think I take Fritz2/3 for analysis just because it beats me? Certainly not, may it be #1 in SSDF or somewhere else. My very personal opinion and experience is that the best analysis is provided by Century, Shredder, both Tigers, Junior, Hiarcs and MCP where the first four are slightly better.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.