Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 04:14:14 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 06:48:54, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On November 26, 2000 at 23:47:20, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On November 26, 2000 at 23:46:03, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On November 26, 2000 at 19:15:55, Michael Fuhrmann wrote: >>> >>>>A recent post, on which there seemed to be some agreement, mentioned that there >>>>are some positions where the right move is obvious to a decent human player but >>>>not found by even the best programs. Can anyone post an example or two of such a >>>>position where a great program looks stupid? Thanks. >>> >>>[D]8/3k4/p1p1p1p1/PpPpPpPp/1P1P1P1P/8/8/R1B1K1BR w KQ - 0 0 >>> >>>Programs will return a huge score for White, but of course this is a dead draw. >>>The only legal way to lose this position from either side is to resign. >> >>Opps! That last sentence is absolutely false. See! Humans can look stupid too! > >How can white have eight pawns and two darksquared bishops? :) Heh, heh. Who is here stupid?! Very funny. Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.