Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:48:18 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 12:02:35, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >Hi, > >here can you find information about the Gandalf 4.32g beta test. >We think a good idea for user which have interest: > >CCE forum: >http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/ > >Do you have questions about Gandalf 4.32g ? >(ultimativ TOP chess program, is running under a lot of or better all new >commercial GUIs (playing software) as a "WinBoard Engine") ! > >Furthermore, beta testers copy results and error messages (important for Steen) >in this fora. > >This is a service from Gambit-Soft and Steen Suurballe. > >Thanks and ... Have a nice day ! > >Best >Frank I respond here to your message because of the problem of writing in that forum. You asked it to do longer time control games. I know that Gandalf is better at longer time control. Gandlaf4.32f did better results in my 15 minutes game against Fritz6light relative to my 5 minutes games. The reason that I did 15 minutes games is that I wanted to compare 4.32f with 4.32g and I wanted to use the same conditions as 4.32f. Using longer time control will not give me information about comparison between 4.32f and 4.32g because I almost did not do games at longer time control with 4.32f. I can add that gandalf 4.32f liked more the a3 f6,a3 f5,a3 g6,a3 g5,a3 h6, a3 h5,a3 Na6, a3 Nh6, a3 Nf6, a3 Nh6 opening and got better results in these games and I tested only the a3 a6,...a3 e5 opening with 4.32g so I expect 4.32g to get better result if I continue the match of 15 minutes per game. I will use 64 mbytes hash for the next games because you say it does better results with 64 mbytes. I did not decide if to use longer time control or if to cntinue the comparison between 4.32f and 4.32g Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.