Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 10:55:13 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 13:48:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 27, 2000 at 12:02:35, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>here can you find information about the Gandalf 4.32g beta test. >>We think a good idea for user which have interest: >> >>CCE forum: >>http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/ >> >>Do you have questions about Gandalf 4.32g ? >>(ultimativ TOP chess program, is running under a lot of or better all new >>commercial GUIs (playing software) as a "WinBoard Engine") ! >> >>Furthermore, beta testers copy results and error messages (important for Steen) >>in this fora. >> >>This is a service from Gambit-Soft and Steen Suurballe. >> >>Thanks and ... Have a nice day ! >> >>Best >>Frank > >I respond here to your message because of the problem of writing in that forum. >You asked it to do longer time control games. Yes, sorry ! I see the problem in the Parsimony Forum :-( I hope not a long time ! > >I know that Gandalf is better at longer time control. > >Gandlaf4.32f did better results in my 15 minutes game against Fritz6light >relative to my 5 minutes games. > >The reason that I did 15 minutes games is that I wanted to compare 4.32f with >4.32g and I wanted to use the same conditions as 4.32f. Yes a good idea ! >Using longer time control will not give me information about comparison between >4.32f and 4.32g because I almost did not do games at longer time control with >4.32f. OK, I don`t know this ! >I can add that gandalf 4.32f liked more the a3 f6,a3 f5,a3 g6,a3 g5,a3 h6, a3 >h5,a3 Na6, a3 Nh6, a3 Nf6, a3 Nh6 opening and got better results in these games >and I tested only the a3 a6,...a3 e5 opening with 4.32g so I expect 4.32g to get >better result if I continue the match of 15 minutes per game. >I will use 64 mbytes hash for the next games because you say it does better >results with 64 mbytes. >I did not decide if to use longer time control or if to cntinue the comparison >between 4.32f and 4.32g I have not a direct comparison but when I see from different user results with 64 or 128 MB are the results with 64 MB better. I am not sure why but it is interesting. Thanks ! Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.