Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:19:20 01/15/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 15, 1998 at 08:06:18, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: >On January 15, 1998 at 07:54:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> [...] At least 10 it missed I don't >>agree with, because of huge tactical scores for what is supposedly the >>wrong move... > >Yes, there are a couple of these in ECM, WCSAC, and others. > >I always take them as they are because I often suspect that the >solution moves are really deep mates. > >We should probably try to generate "reference" versions of all these >suites -- just as Amir suggested in an earlier post. > >Any volunteers out there to coordinate such efforts? > >=Ernst= I'm going to do a "ECM-derivative" test suite. I'm going to try to cull the 1 second positions first, and whatever else it takes to get this into the < 500 position range, although I'd really prefer a 300 position suite like WAC, so that it doesn't take forever to run. I'll be happy to post what I come up with, and also to take suggestions on what to exclude to make it managable...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.