Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:24:31 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 13:55:13, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On November 27, 2000 at 13:48:18, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 27, 2000 at 12:02:35, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>here can you find information about the Gandalf 4.32g beta test. >>>We think a good idea for user which have interest: >>> >>>CCE forum: >>>http://f22.parsimony.net/forum41668/ >>> >>>Do you have questions about Gandalf 4.32g ? >>>(ultimativ TOP chess program, is running under a lot of or better all new >>>commercial GUIs (playing software) as a "WinBoard Engine") ! >>> >>>Furthermore, beta testers copy results and error messages (important for Steen) >>>in this fora. >>> >>>This is a service from Gambit-Soft and Steen Suurballe. >>> >>>Thanks and ... Have a nice day ! >>> >>>Best >>>Frank >> >>I respond here to your message because of the problem of writing in that forum. >>You asked it to do longer time control games. > >Yes, sorry ! >I see the problem in the Parsimony Forum :-( >I hope not a long time ! > >> >>I know that Gandalf is better at longer time control. >> >>Gandlaf4.32f did better results in my 15 minutes game against Fritz6light >>relative to my 5 minutes games. >> >>The reason that I did 15 minutes games is that I wanted to compare 4.32f with >>4.32g and I wanted to use the same conditions as 4.32f. > >Yes a good idea ! > >>Using longer time control will not give me information about comparison between >>4.32f and 4.32g because I almost did not do games at longer time control with >>4.32f. > >OK, I don`t know this ! > >>I can add that gandalf 4.32f liked more the a3 f6,a3 f5,a3 g6,a3 g5,a3 h6, a3 >>h5,a3 Na6, a3 Nh6, a3 Nf6, a3 Nh6 opening and got better results in these games >>and I tested only the a3 a6,...a3 e5 opening with 4.32g so I expect 4.32g to get >>better result if I continue the match of 15 minutes per game. > >>I will use 64 mbytes hash for the next games because you say it does better >>results with 64 mbytes. >>I did not decide if to use longer time control or if to cntinue the comparison >>between 4.32f and 4.32g > >I have not a direct comparison but when I see from different user results with >64 or 128 MB are the results with 64 MB better. I am not sure why but it is >interesting. You seem to be right. Gandalf4.32g(64 mbytes) is leading 3-0 from the same positions against Fritz6light when the result was 2.5-.5 for fritz6light against Gandalf4.32g(128 mbytes). I am not going to finish the match from the same positions today because I have other things to do. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.