Author: Uri Blass
Date: 23:27:44 11/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 20:39:14, paul bedrey wrote: >James did you play with Gambit Tiger yet? I've been thinking of playing them >against each other but won't if you have done it already or know if one is >better than the other. I've always thought Hiarcs 7.32 was under-rated. I like >its style. > >Paul I expect Hiarcs to suffer at longer time control because of the retaining hash tables bug. I analyze some games of it and I found that there were cases when it had a wrong evaluation in the first plies because of retaining hash tables bug. In fast games it is not a big problem because of the fact that it can get deep enough to find a better move but at longer time control it may have big problems because it can waste a lot of time to solve failing low problem and in the worst case it has not enough time to solve the fail low and play a bad move. I believe that it happens more at time control of 2 hours/40 moves when in move 38,39 or 40 it has not enough time to solve the fail low problem. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.