Author: pavel
Date: 00:00:22 11/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2000 at 17:34:07, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On November 27, 2000 at 12:51:26, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>Position #1 >> >>r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - > >Analysis by Gandalf 4.32g: > >1.Ra3 Be7 > -+ (-1.52) Depth: 2 00:00:00 >1.Qc1 > -+ (-1.50) Depth: 2 00:00:00 >1.Qc1 Be7 > µ (-0.96) Depth: 2 00:00:00 >1.Qc1 Rc8 2.Ra3 > µ (-0.88) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Qc1 Qxa4 2.Qxc4 Nf4 > µ (-1.20) Depth: 4 00:00:00 >1.Qc1 Nd3 2.Bxd3 cxd3 3.f3 Qxa4 > µ (-1.31) Depth: 5 00:00:00 57kN >1.Qd4 > µ (-1.29) Depth: 5 00:00:01 57kN >1.Qd4 Rc8 2.Nxh6 Nf6 3.Nxf6 Rxe1+ 4.Kh2 > µ (-1.20) Depth: 5 00:00:01 100kN >1.Qd4 Rc8 2.Ne3 Nxe3 3.Rexe3 Qf7 4.Nc3 Rxe3 5.Qxe3 > µ (-1.04) Depth: 6 00:00:02 250kN >1.Qd4 > ³ (-0.59) Depth: 7 00:00:08 950kN >1.Qd4 Nf4 2.Qxc4 Qxa4 3.Qc7 Bxe4 4.Bxe4 Ne2+ 5.Rxe2 Qd1+ > ³ (-0.49) Depth: 7 00:00:14 1800kN >1.Qd4 Rc8 2.Nxh6 Rc7 3.Nxd6 Rxe1+ 4.Kh2 Nc2 5.Nhf7+ Rxf7 > ³ (-0.46) Depth: 8 00:00:46 7200kN >1.Qd4 c3 2.Bxc3 Nxc3 3.Rxc3 d5 4.Rc7 Qb8 5.Rd7 dxe4 > µ (-1.23) Depth: 9 00:01:52 19850kN >1.Qd4 c3 2.Bxc3 Nxc3 3.Qxb4 Nxe4 4.Qxb7 Rb8 5.Qxb8 Qxb8 > -+ (-1.68) Depth: 10 00:07:21 73200kN >1.Kh2 > -+ (-1.66) Depth: 10 00:10:11 100800kN >1.Kh2 c3 2.Nxh6 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qf7 4.Nxd5 Nxd5 5.Qb3 Rc8 > µ (-1.10) Depth: 10 00:14:19 140650kN >1.Nxh6 > µ (-1.08) Depth: 10 00:18:39 183300kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kf1 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qf7 4.Qg4 a5 5.Rf3 Nf6 > µ (-1.07) Depth: 10 00:19:23 190850kN >1.Nxh6 > ³ (-0.62) Depth: 11 00:30:00 294850kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Nf5 cxb2 3.Qg4 g6 4.Re2 Qd7 5.Nd4 Re7 > = (-0.12) Depth: 11 00:35:37 346900kN > >Stopped analysis after 40 minutes on an A800 with 56Mb hash. > >Best wishes... >Mogens is Nxh6 the best move here? for sure? Qd4 seems like a better option to me. thanks pavs.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.