Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:01:30 11/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2000 at 07:55:38, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 28, 2000 at 07:24:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 28, 2000 at 07:12:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On November 28, 2000 at 00:25:55, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >>> >>>>I think it's excellent that Gandalf gets the first 5 ply correct, and gives a >>>>good move for the 6th ply. It probably takes a deep search to find that 4. >>>>Kh2!! wins in that line. Any chance you could let Gandalf search overnight, or >>>>a day or two to see if it would find Kh2 from the original position, and >>>>possibly give a winning evaluation? I'd be very interested to see the results. >>> >>>Sure, I'll let it work on the position tonight and see what happens. >>> >>>Mogens. >> >>I guess that you will find the main line >> >>1.Nxh6 c3 2.Nf5 cxb2 3.Qg4 Bc8 4.Qh4+ Rh6 5.Nxh6 gxh6 6.Ree3 Qe7 7.Qxe7 Bxe7 >>with 1.04 pawns for white. > >The last main line is my prediction for depth 13. > >I guess that the score is going to drop at depth 14 to +0.57 pawns for white >when the maion line begins with 1.Nch6 c3 2.Nf5 cxb2 3.Qg4 g6 4.Re2 Qd7 5.Nh4 >Bc6 6.Ng6 Rg6 7.Qxg6 Qg7 8.Qh5+ Qh6 > >I also guess that part of my guesses will be correct but not all of them. > >Uri My last guess. I expect gandalf to fail high at depth 15 if you give it enough time to get to this depth and the main line is going to be different without the move 4.Re2 assuming that you give it enough time to solve the fail high. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.