Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 09:12:12 11/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2000 at 11:50:12, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 28, 2000 at 10:30:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >[snip] >To add a bit, here is an output from a chess engine for one of the WAC >positions: > >Middlegame phase. > 2 -173 4 525 e5c6 d6c6 > 2 -173 4 1232 e5c6 d6c6 > 3 -188 5 1569 e5c6 d6c6 f6h5 > 3 -187 6 4205 g3g6 ! > 3 -123 6 4577 g3g6 > 3 -122 7 6316 f6h5 ! > 3 -101 7 7444 f6e8 ! > 3 -17 7 7746 f6e8 d6e5 d4e5 d8e8 > 4 -17 7 8247 f6e8 d6e5 d4e5 d8e8 > 4 -17 8 10898 f6e8 d6e5 d4e5 d8e8 > 5 -12 8 11626 f6e8 d6e5 d4e5 d8e8 a1d1 > 5 -11 11 22518 g3g6 ! > 5 383 14 33800 g3g6 !! > 5 999996 14 34042 g3g6 d6e5 > 5 999996 15 34369 g3g6 d6e5 >Learning score: 999996 best: 36 depth:5 hash: F45FB3C8 > >Notice that it 'found' g6 at ply 3. Was it 'solved'? Obviously not. Why not? >Because it had no idea how good the position was. Because of this, the choice >was easily abandoned at later ply. Given enough time, it found the right move >for the right reason and stuck to it.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.