Author: Will Singleton
Date: 23:35:28 11/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 00:26:22, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On November 28, 2000 at 21:05:24, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>On November 28, 2000 at 14:45:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>. >>> >>>This shows you don't understand the US Constitution very well. One purpose >>>of the federal government is to resolve disputes _between_ states. Another >>>is to regulate trade between the states. Etc. So states _do_ count in the >>>overall decision making process, as they should. The federal government is >>>a part of the individual state governmental process... >> >>Dr. Hyatt, >> >>I guess guys that go by the name of PinkFloydHomer@yahoo.com don't have much >>information about anything. Keep on posting your highly rational posts, Sir. >> >>I agree that this is a "federal election" for the office of President of the >>United States of America. Individual state Supreme Courts and Legislatures are >>subordinate to the Federal agencies. >> >> >>Are you a Republican or just an honest fellow? >> >> >>Tim Frohlick > > >I am actually neither Republican nor Democrat. I am more conservative than >liberal, believe in less government, not more, believe in less entitlement >not more, less socialism, not more, etc. But I generally vote for the person >I think is best qualified, with the best ideas. Sometimes a Democrat, sometimes >a republican. More often a Republican, probably, but not by a big margin. Right. Just tell me the last time you saw a Democrat for less government, less socialism, and less entitlement. Let's at least be real, and not temporize. There's a lot to be said for voting party and principle, rather than for the individual.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.