Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:22:52 11/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 07:17:57, Amir Ban wrote: >On November 29, 2000 at 05:48:05, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On November 29, 2000 at 05:04:18, Amir Ban wrote: >> >>Nolot #1: >> >>>17 minutes is not a fast solving time for this position. >> >>What would you consider a fast solving time for this position? > >Anything under 2 minutes. This is analysis from a version I'm currently testing: > > >r3qb1k/1b4p1/p2pr2p/3n4/Pnp1N1N1/6RP/1B3PP1/1B1QR1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Junior x.1: > >1.a5 Rb8 > ³ (-0.29) Depth: 3 00:00:00 >1.Qd4 Nf4 2.Rge3 Nbd3 > = (-0.02) Depth: 6 00:00:00 18kN >1.Qd4 Nf4 2.Rge3 Nbd3 > = (-0.02) Depth: 6 00:00:00 18kN >1.Qd4 Nf4 2.Rge3 Nbd3 > = (-0.02) Depth: 6 00:00:00 18kN >1.Qd4 Nf4 2.Rge3 Nbd3 > = (-0.02) Depth: 6 00:00:00 18kN >1.Qd4 Nf4 2.Rge3 Nbd3 3.Bxd3 Nxd3 4.Rxd3 cxd3 > ³ (-0.35) Depth: 9 00:00:00 237kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Bxc3 Nxc3 3.Rxc3 Bxe4 4.Bxe4 Rxe4 5.Nf7+ Kg8 6.Rce3 > ³ (-0.26) Depth: 9 00:00:01 766kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Bxc3 Nxc3 3.Rxc3 Bxe4 4.Bxe4 Rxe4 5.Nf7+ Kg8 6.Rxe4 Qxe4 7.Rc7 Nd5 >8.Rb7 > ³ (-0.26) Depth: 12 00:00:23 9682kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kh2 Rxh6 3.Ng5 Qd7 4.Qg4 Qc7 5.Ne6 Qc8 6.Ng5 Kg8 7.Bf5 cxb2 8.Bxc8 >Rxc8 9.Ne6 > = (-0.12) Depth: 14 00:02:57 69608kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kh2 Rxh6 3.Ng5 Qd7 4.Qg4 Qc7 5.Ne6 Qf7 6.Ng5 > = (0.00) Depth: 15 00:06:31 147930kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Kh2 Rxh6 3.Ng5 Qd7 4.Qg4 Qc7 5.Ne6 Qf7 6.Ng5 > = (0.00) Depth: 16 00:14:43 322408kN >1.Nxh6 c3 2.Ba1 Rxh6 3.Nxc3 Qh5 4.Qd4 Qf7 5.Rf3 Qc7 6.Rg3 Qc5 7.Qxc5 dxc5 8.Bg6 > = (-0.03) Depth: 17 00:49:45 1013974kN > >(Ban, M-Systems 29.11.2000) > >Amir The second move in the main line seems not to be the right move. 2.Nf5 is winning. I did not analyze Kh2 or Ba1. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.