Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability?

Author: Severi Salminen

Date: 05:23:56 11/29/00

Hi!

Robert Hyatt said that when he tested the performance differences between SEE
and MVV/LVA he saw a 10% advantage for SEE. Is this 10% really worth it when we
consider the fact that SEE might miss some tactical shots, like pins and other
check involving sequenses? This might be also true if we use standing pat
cutoffs in qsearch, but generally. Has anyone pitted a version of his/her
program using SEE against MVV/LVA in a long match (more than 100 games at
least)? What were the results?

Severi

Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Bruce Moreland 09:33:27 11/29/00
Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Robert Hyatt 07:26:41 11/29/00
- Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Severi Salminen 08:22:38 11/29/00
  - Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Robert Hyatt 09:45:34 11/29/00
    - Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Severi Salminen 03:25:29 11/30/00
      - Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Bruce Moreland 09:56:23 11/30/00
        
        Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Severi Salminen 11:25:32 11/30/00
        
        Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Bruce Moreland 17:20:15 11/30/00
        
        Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Christophe Theron 23:59:35 11/30/00
Re: MVV/LVA or SEE - liability? Addenum... Severi Salminen 05:30:42 11/29/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.