Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 05:30:42 11/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 08:23:56, Severi Salminen wrote: >Hi! > >Robert Hyatt said that when he tested the performance differences between SEE >and MVV/LVA he saw a 10% advantage for SEE. Is this 10% really worth it when we >consider the fact that SEE might miss some tactical shots, like pins and other >check involving sequenses? This might be also true if we use standing pat >cutoffs in qsearch, but generally. Has anyone pitted a version of his/her >program using SEE against MVV/LVA in a long match (more than 100 games at >least)? What were the results? > >Severi And after rechecking Hyatt said that SEE is about 2x better in qsearch. And he was talking about number of nodes searched, not speed. So I think that a few pins doesn't matter here...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.