Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:17:04 11/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 16:34:25, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >also EVERYONE knows the opposite, weiner/meyer-kahlen again are trying to cheat >the court. they try to accuse me for a false oath. today again they are saying >the following: > >"mr kästner has used insider knowledge of shredder to prepare rebel and tiger >for london against shredder. in computershaak mr noomen himself wrote: "at the >last moment, after a telephone-call with marcus kästner, i decided to use a >secret weapon against shredder..." so it´s clear that mr kästner has recommended >the openings for schröder b.v." > >this they said OF COURSE they are knowing exactly that this is false! >some weeks before ed, jeroen and christophe definetely said that ONLY jeroen was >responsible for the opening choice! > >so please ed, jeroen and christophe, be so kind and repeat your statement here >and if possible also via email. > >in 14 hours the court is coming together and it would be nice to have your >written statements. > >marcus Only as time is so short : if Jeroen really wrote in his article in "computershaak" like this , statements by Ed Schroder and Christophe Theron are obviously irrelevant and wouldn't help you . Only a message of Jeroon himself stating that his article put it in a wrong way would do .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.