Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 14:40:24 11/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 17:17:04, Peter Berger wrote: >On November 29, 2000 at 16:34:25, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >>also EVERYONE knows the opposite, weiner/meyer-kahlen again are trying to cheat >>the court. they try to accuse me for a false oath. today again they are saying >>the following: >> >>"mr kästner has used insider knowledge of shredder to prepare rebel and tiger >>for london against shredder. in computershaak mr noomen himself wrote: "at the >>last moment, after a telephone-call with marcus kästner, i decided to use a >>secret weapon against shredder..." so it´s clear that mr kästner has recommended >>the openings for schröder b.v." >> >>this they said OF COURSE they are knowing exactly that this is false! >>some weeks before ed, jeroen and christophe definetely said that ONLY jeroen was >>responsible for the opening choice! >> >>so please ed, jeroen and christophe, be so kind and repeat your statement here >>and if possible also via email. >> >>in 14 hours the court is coming together and it would be nice to have your >>written statements. >> >>marcus > >Only as time is so short : if Jeroen really wrote in his article in >"computershaak" like this , statements by Ed Schroder and Christophe Theron are >obviously irrelevant and wouldn't help you . Only a message of Jeroon himself >stating that his article put it in a wrong way would do . Jeroen was at home. I was in London. In the end it was me who decided to play 1.e4 or 1.d4 as for all games. For the Shredder game I decided to play the Belgrade (if possible) and I remember that Marcus was against it (too risky). It is also not true Marcus has used inside information. It is wild guess by Weiner. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.