Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Experimentation with move ordering

Author: James Swafford

Date: 16:33:17 11/29/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 29, 2000 at 15:50:43, Bruce Moreland wrote:
>They will produce the same values on signed ints.  If you use unsigned values, a
>/ 2 will be compiled by the Microsoft compiler I use as:
>
>    shr eax, 1
>
>If you use an signed value, you get:
>
>    cdq
>    sub eax, edx
>    sar eax, 1
>
>This is an attempt to avoid a divide, but it's a lot of evil stuff compared with
>the first one.  I bet "cdq" annoys the processor, but I don't know for sure, and
>in any case that's three instructions compared with one.
>


cdq is an ugly one for sure.  If I'm not mistaken, it involves
a comparison, a conditional jump, and a mov if the flag indicates
the number is negative.  Pretty nasty.  Seems to me it would be
better to just use unsigned ints wherever possible.

--
James




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.