Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 16:49:42 11/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 12:53:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 29, 2000 at 12:36:11, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On November 29, 2000 at 11:20:45, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On November 29, 2000 at 10:15:42, Peter Skinner wrote: >>> >>>>On November 29, 2000 at 03:32:56, Alexander Kure wrote: >>>> >>>>>No wonder, you didn't play the big ones :-) >>>>> >>>>>Check out crafty and his clones, all the tiger engines, NimzoX, ... >>>>> >>>>>Greetings >>>>>Alex >>>> >>>>I agree, although Fritz 5.32 is still very strong. I use it sometimes over ICS, >>>>and I stil win 80% of my games playing the "big ones". The only thing I notice >>>>is that is it sometimes gets very low on time. >>> >>>What is your definition of the "big ones"? >>> >>>Alex mentioned Crafty clones,Tiger engines and NimzoX so please count only games >>>against these programs otherwise you and alex do not mean to the same thing when >>>you say the "big ones" and it is misleading when you do not give information >>>about your definition for the "big ones". >>> >>>Uri >> >>I am talking of course about Fritz 6, Nimzo 8, Tiger clones, really various >>programs that Alex mentioned, plus others. > >The others are probably most of the players because it is the only way that I >can see Fritz5.32 scores 80%. I actually play mostly computers, and rarely humans. When I mean others, I mean Hiarcs 7.32, Nimzo 7.32, Shredder 4.0, Gandalf. That is what I mean by others. >The important question is who are the opponents and not where do you play. I agree, most times I am outgunned on hardware, but most times my book I have made more than makes up for it. It is a rather small book ( 34 megs ), but of very good quality.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.