Author: Harald Faber
Date: 21:40:57 11/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 20:24:06, Rajen Gupta wrote: >On November 29, 2000 at 05:45:01, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On November 28, 2000 at 16:43:55, Rajen Gupta wrote: >> >>>Based purely on guesswork would it be reasonable to assume that the after >>>extensive testing, the ranking list would be something like this: >>> >>>1)Chess Tiger(latest version) >>>2)Shredder5 >>>3)Chessmaster8000 >>>4)Rebel(latest version) >>>5)Nimzo 8 >>>6)Fritz6b >>>7)Junior6 >>> >>>rajen gupta >> >>Nimzo8 is certainly weaker than the rest. > >Hi harald: > >what makes you think NIMZO 8 is waeker than the rest.From Jorge Pichards testing >it is certainly holding its own against Fritz6. > >rajen gupta There are two results available that make me believe that Nimzo8 is weaker: Nimzo8/Athlon500 - Gambit Tiger/200MHz: 0.5-3.5 Nimzo8/Athlon500 - Chess Tiger 13/200MHz: 5.5-6.5 Time control: 40/120+rest/60
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.