Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 01:47:48 11/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 28, 2000 at 21:05:24, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: >On November 28, 2000 at 14:45:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >. >> >>This shows you don't understand the US Constitution very well. One purpose >>of the federal government is to resolve disputes _between_ states. Another >>is to regulate trade between the states. Etc. So states _do_ count in the >>overall decision making process, as they should. The federal government is >>a part of the individual state governmental process... > >Dr. Hyatt, > I do understand that. It is the same way with the EU, although the EU doesnt have nearly as much control as a federation as does the US over its states. And I (and others) still believe that one-man one-vote is the best, most logical, and most democratic system in such a case. The entities of a federal government are from states and upward. If it has any lower involvement, then it is just a country, in which case one-man one-vote would still be the best system.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.