Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:45:56 11/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2000 at 22:10:14, Joshua Lee wrote: > Imagine Having a CB program that chooses the best score out of several engines >Fritz Gandalf Nimzo Shredder Chess Tiger Rebel and any other program that is >good at something that other programs aren't or a program that is unique in a >special way like in it's programing or evaluation. I think if Fritz managed 2457 >on a 500Mhz Pentium >on this "monster" running at 750Mhz *4 (or what cpu speeds compaq offers) >This Super Kibitzer would be stronger than Deep Junior at Dortmund for several >reasons >1 it would have the speed that Deep Junior had and then some >2 Have stronger Endgame play >3 More precise Tactics Fritz Junior Nimzo and Little Goliath working together i >wouldn't be suprised to here mate anounced by move 15 in 20 moves( ok that's a >bit crazy) >4 Positional Play ...Gandalf is great but i noticed something when i was looking >at the Test your positional play positions and the test at Tony Hedlund's >webpage. Other program's scored higher but i bet the way to explain this is that >even though one program may have more chess knowledge not every program uses the >same piece values ect. So some luck comes into play, I wonder if anyone uses >default piece values 9 for queen, 5 for rook, 3 for Knight's and Bishops, 1 for >pawns. I do not trust positional test suites because I guess that there are a lot of mistakes in them. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.