Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SMAR T move from weiner/meyer kahlen in the chessbits case?

Author: Jeroen Noomen

Date: 11:39:23 11/30/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 30, 2000 at 14:32:34, Jeroen Noomen wrote:

To everybody in this forum:

What is said in the Weiner/Stefan Meyer-Kahlen vs. Kästner case to the judges is
an UTTER LIE. I find it disgusting to read that they use my phrases to turn this
case into the wrong direction.

Yes, Marcus called me. Yes, there was a decision to use a secret weapon. But I
MADE THAT DECISION. Nobody else. I was responsible for the books in London, and
the choice of opening in this game.

Dear judges, you have been cheated.

Jeroen Noomen


>>also EVERYONE knows the opposite, weiner/meyer-kahlen again are trying to cheat
>>the court. they try to accuse me for a false oath. today again they are saying
>>the following:
>>
>>"mr kästner has used insider knowledge of shredder to prepare rebel and tiger
>>for london against shredder. in computershaak mr noomen himself wrote: "at the
>>last moment, after a telephone-call with marcus kästner, i decided to use a
>>secret weapon against shredder..." so it´s clear that mr kästner has recommended
>>the openings for schröder b.v."
>>
>>this they said OF COURSE they are knowing exactly that this is false!
>>some weeks before ed, jeroen and christophe definetely said that ONLY jeroen was
>>responsible for the opening choice!
>>
>>so please ed, jeroen and christophe, be so kind and repeat your statement here
>>and if possible also via email.
>>
>>in 14 hours the court is coming together and it would be nice to have your
>>written statements.
>>
>>marcus



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.