Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 08:11:27 12/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2000 at 10:11:52, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 02, 2000 at 06:18:32, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>On December 01, 2000 at 17:39:35, Franck ZIBI wrote: >> >>> >>>Hello Thomas, >>> >>>>Yes Kamikaze Shredder needs 10Min.26sec. on my AMD K6-2+ 600Mhz in the 12ply. >>>That's simply impressive, what's the Shredder Eval at ply 12 ? >>>Does it see the win or consider it as a draw ? >>>I was already impressed by Shredder in London (WMCCC) where it found a narrow >>>escape against Nimzo thanks to (among all) its tactical power. >>> >>>>Hi Frank,what about a little goody? Will i get your new version of ZChess? >>>You will find the last beta version of ZChess (Version 2.22) at : >>>http://myweb.worldnet.net/~fzibi/zchess/beta/zchess.zip >>> >>>If you already have ZChess 2.0, you need only the following >>>(much smaller) file : >>>http://myweb.worldnet.net/~fzibi/zchess/beta/zchexe.zip >>> >>>This version appears to be between 60 and 80 elo point stronger then >>>ZChess 2.0 London. >>> >>>Best Regards. >>The final evalution of Kamikaze Shredder on ply 12 is +1,14 for White. >>Thanks for ZChess 2.22, works fine under S5.Go on ZChess. >>Greetings Thomas > >I think that the evaluations and the results of kamikaze shredder are not >interesting because I am sure that it is easy to generate weak personalities of >other chess programs that find the right move in this case. > >It is more interesting to know how much time does shredder5 need to find the >right move. > >Uri I don´t think so. Mabe Kamikaze Shredder plays stronger as Shredder 5. See Gambit Tiger and Tiger 13.0. I will play tournament games the next days if i can organize my time good. Thomas
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.