Author: Georg Langrath
Date: 12:45:55 12/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 02, 2000 at 14:58:45, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 02, 2000 at 13:33:07, walter irvin wrote: > >>On December 02, 2000 at 12:06:17, Georg Langrath wrote: >> >>>It is interesting how strong chesscomputers will be in future only depending on >>>hardware. Couldn’t you get an idea if you let two computers play against each >>>others with auto 232? One of the computer had usual time controls and the other >>>ten times longer time. Then you see what ELO the computer got that had the long >>>time controls. In that way you could foresee how strong computers could get, >>>when they are ten times faster than today. >>> >>>Georg >>the test you want to run would be better if ponder were left off .because if the >>program that gets less time predicts the move then the fact that it gets less >>time will be cancelled out .so your test would be good if ponder was off on both >>programs . > >I think that you can do the test with ponder on and you do not need that one >program will get more time. > >The only thing that you need is different computers when one of them is 10 times >faster. > >You can do a match between programs on p100 and programs on p1000 when the time >control is 20 hours/40 moves and get the results. > >Uri Yes a good idea but there is one question. Is the difference in ELO the same between p100 and p1000 as between p1000 and p10000? With my idea you can examine that. I think that the difference is bigger between p100 and p1000 than between p1000 and p10000. But I am not sure. I would examine myself, but I don't have two computers. Georg
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.