Author: Paul Doire
Date: 13:59:59 12/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2000 at 15:34:48, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On December 03, 2000 at 13:25:00, Paul Doire wrote: > >>I am attempting same pc engine matches. It has been brought to my attention >>that Didziz has a page that describes the procedure for proper comparison. >>I have attempted to implement his suggestions(comparing think times with other >>prog running in background). >>But CM6000 doesn't have ability in "think lines" to measure nodes, only depth >>such as 4/09,5/10.Rebel 11 and CM8000 do have the ability to measure nodes. >>Is there a universal nodes measurement utility available so I can properly >>gauge nodes per second??? >> >>I have attempted "Depth" searches but am unsure if accurate,Chess Tiger >>searches to depth of ten with CM6000 running in background in only 2.6 secs. >>While CM6000 takes 42 secs to get to 5/10 with Chess Tiger in background. >>Is it possible for Chess Tiger to search over 16 times faster??? >> >>Thanks, >>Paul > >Does one card whose engine is turning 4500 RPM's go 1.5 times faster than one >whose engine is turning 3500 RPM's? > >The RPM figure is useful, but only in context of gear ratio. > >It is very difficult for chess programmers to supply you with gear ratio >figures, but RPM's are easy. > >You can't compare them, because the gear ratio isn't supplied. > >Perhaps some programs have search in their eval. You do less nodes if you count >a three-ply search as one node. > >Who knows? > >bruce I guess a better term to use is each progs CPU usage regardless of task at hand,then one could allocate proper time based on each progs cpu"hoggage"!!?? Paul
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.