Author: Paul Doire
Date: 13:59:59 12/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2000 at 15:34:48, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On December 03, 2000 at 13:25:00, Paul Doire wrote: > >>I am attempting same pc engine matches. It has been brought to my attention >>that Didziz has a page that describes the procedure for proper comparison. >>I have attempted to implement his suggestions(comparing think times with other >>prog running in background). >>But CM6000 doesn't have ability in "think lines" to measure nodes, only depth >>such as 4/09,5/10.Rebel 11 and CM8000 do have the ability to measure nodes. >>Is there a universal nodes measurement utility available so I can properly >>gauge nodes per second??? >> >>I have attempted "Depth" searches but am unsure if accurate,Chess Tiger >>searches to depth of ten with CM6000 running in background in only 2.6 secs. >>While CM6000 takes 42 secs to get to 5/10 with Chess Tiger in background. >>Is it possible for Chess Tiger to search over 16 times faster??? >> >>Thanks, >>Paul > >Does one card whose engine is turning 4500 RPM's go 1.5 times faster than one >whose engine is turning 3500 RPM's? > >The RPM figure is useful, but only in context of gear ratio. > >It is very difficult for chess programmers to supply you with gear ratio >figures, but RPM's are easy. > >You can't compare them, because the gear ratio isn't supplied. > >Perhaps some programs have search in their eval. You do less nodes if you count >a three-ply search as one node. > >Who knows? > >bruce I guess a better term to use is each progs CPU usage regardless of task at hand,then one could allocate proper time based on each progs cpu"hoggage"!!?? Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.