Author: Paul Doire
Date: 14:12:13 12/03/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 2000 at 17:03:32, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On December 03, 2000 at 16:59:59, Paul Doire wrote: > >>On December 03, 2000 at 15:34:48, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On December 03, 2000 at 13:25:00, Paul Doire wrote: >>> >>>>I am attempting same pc engine matches. It has been brought to my attention >>>>that Didziz has a page that describes the procedure for proper comparison. >>>>I have attempted to implement his suggestions(comparing think times with other >>>>prog running in background). >>>>But CM6000 doesn't have ability in "think lines" to measure nodes, only depth >>>>such as 4/09,5/10.Rebel 11 and CM8000 do have the ability to measure nodes. >>>>Is there a universal nodes measurement utility available so I can properly >>>>gauge nodes per second??? >>>> >>>>I have attempted "Depth" searches but am unsure if accurate,Chess Tiger >>>>searches to depth of ten with CM6000 running in background in only 2.6 secs. >>>>While CM6000 takes 42 secs to get to 5/10 with Chess Tiger in background. >>>>Is it possible for Chess Tiger to search over 16 times faster??? >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Paul >>> >>>Does one card whose engine is turning 4500 RPM's go 1.5 times faster than one >>>whose engine is turning 3500 RPM's? >>> >>>The RPM figure is useful, but only in context of gear ratio. >>> >>>It is very difficult for chess programmers to supply you with gear ratio >>>figures, but RPM's are easy. >>> >>>You can't compare them, because the gear ratio isn't supplied. >>> >>>Perhaps some programs have search in their eval. You do less nodes if you count >>>a three-ply search as one node. >>> >>>Who knows? >>> >>>bruce >> >>I guess a better term to use is each progs CPU usage regardless of task >>at hand,then one could allocate proper time based on each progs cpu"hoggage"!!?? >> >>Paul > >That's the thing, they are all using 100% of it constantly. > >bruce Than is the info I received incorrect?? Is there no way to run engine-engine matches on same pc with accuracy.Everyone tells me CM6000 is cpu dominant,is there no way around this issue except separate machine matches? Paul
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.