Author: Ernst A. Heinz
Date: 11:31:47 12/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Vincent, >I don't 6 gigabyte of RAM, RAM very expensive. >If i would have 6 gigabyte of RAM i would use it for transposition >table however for the biggest part of it. As usual you do not really know what you are talking about. My RAM-based knowledgeable endgame databases consume less than 16MB of memory. Just read my book before posting such utter nonsense next time. =Ernst= >>>Hello here a nightmare scenario when using EGTB, >>>for DIEP that's position #4 from bs2830 testset. >>> >>>Wonder how other progs do with and without egtb on this >>>position. Of course the real problem is that this problem >>>is like a 17 ply problem as there are 5 ply to see then >>>12 checks and it's a stalemate. >> >>This is exactly why I like my combination of interior-node >>recognizers and RAM-based knowledgeable endgame databases >>so much! >> >>See my book on "Scalable Search in Computer Chess" for more >>details (http://supertech.lcs.mit.edu/~heinz/node1.html). >> >>"DarkThought WCCC'99" finds the solution move in 4 seconds >>(see htpp://supertech.lcs.mit.edu/~heinz/dt/) because its >>interior-node recognizers and RAM-based endgame databases >>quickly identify all other moves as far inferior. >> >>=Ernst=
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.