Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 21:53:27 12/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 04, 2000 at 23:15:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On December 04, 2000 at 08:52:12, Thorsten Czub wrote: > > > >Here is a good case in point. obviously 100% off-topic. Nothing to do >with computer chess. not one suggestion to delete it. I have no problem >with such posts. But it would seem that some do. And some don't. How is >this different from the constitution discussion? From the legal discussion? >etc? > > >Pardon me while I go take something for this headache. Caused by trying to >figure out just what "standard" everyone wants to see... I think this is fine, its a bit of harmless fun in what looks like to be a heated discussion that pops up amoung the programmers every now and then. Its not like this was the start of a thread, just a bit of harmless fun in the middle of one. If he had started a new thread with this topic then I would have given it the flick. To me their is a difference as to when and how a post is posted as to what effect it has. If you, me and the others had not commented on your post on how you feel this should affect your moderation of posts, then I think there would of not been one reply to his post. Delete the new posts that start of as being really off topic, but keep the ones like his that are just a bit of harmless fun in the middle of one.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.