Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 11:26:56 01/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 1998 at 12:01:01, Don Dailey wrote: >My program is similar except we are very stingy about extensions. >I am running on a single Alpha for this test so we could adjust down >for hardware but I don't think that is necessary. I think the fast >micros are still outsearching us by quite a bit because our evaluation >is 2/3 of our time. It seems like Nimzo was doing 250K NPS on a 300 MHZ >pentium and I'm only doing 125-175K NPS in middlegames on 1 processor >at 466 MHZ. I don't know if Nimzo is typical or not for the good >micro's. >The question is should we scale down a little for hardware or just use >the numbers I have now? > >I am still running the set but only have 100 problems left or so. I >ran them about 30 seconds to get an idea of how they are distributed >in difficulty. I'll email the problems to you I cannot solve in 10 >seconds so we can "or" them together. > >When we come up the final set I will volunteer to do a pass which might >eliminate multiple solutions or other problems. After I do this I'll >forward the quirky problems (if any) with information for each problem >on why they should be eliminated and we can check each others work >this way. > >Ed has volunteered a repository. Do you want to be the editor and keep >the set up to date? I can do this if you're not inclined. > >- Don > I'm willing since it was something I was planning on doing all along. But it helps when others run it so we can be sure to weed out easy ones without weeding out hard ones...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.