Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 06:14:45 12/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 05, 2000 at 08:16:22, Uri Blass wrote: >The point of Thorsten Czub in his posts some weeks ago was that Fritz's problem >was always that it evaluated 0.00 when it is easy to see that both sides do not >have equal chances and I remember that he talked about a possible future >situation when future fritz shows 0.00 whenfuture shresser understands what is >going on. > >I think that wrong 0.00 happens to every program. That is true IMO. I used Gandalf on the Shredder positions and it didn't understand number 2, 0.06 (or something like that) before Qd7 and Bc5+, then shifted to -0.22/12 after. The first and last position was not evaluated as anything close to 0.00. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.