Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CM8000 relative strength

Author: Jason Williamson

Date: 12:12:08 12/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On December 05, 2000 at 12:23:25, Chris Lott wrote:

>The SSDF list doesn't seem to have CM8000 (or 7000 for that matter). I have
>heard talk on lists and newsgroups that it is even stronger than Fritz 6, et al.
>Has anyone run any fairly stringent competitions with CM8000 yet?

Here is the current standings of my 3rd test tournament:

JWCC-1 Vancouver  2000

                                  1    2    3    4    5    6
1   Nimzo 8           2634  +145  **** ½1½0 ½½1½ 11½½ ½1½½ 1100  12.0/20
2   Junior 6.0        2760   -52  ½0½1 **** ½10½ 1101 010½        8.5/16  78.50
3   Crafty 17.13      2634   +32  ½½0½ ½01½ **** ½10  1110 0½00   8.5/19  75.50
4   Hiarcs 7.32       2718   -23  00½½ 0010 ½01  **** 1011 11     8.5/17  72.25
5   Fritz 6           2752  -143  ½0½½ 101½ 0001 0100 **** ½0½1   8.0/20
6   Chessmaster 8000  2665   +40  0011      1½11 00   ½1½0 ****   7.5/14

Average elo: 2693 <=> Category: 18
gm = 8.00 m = 4.00

Potenially, Chessmaster can still win this.  Hiarcs seems to have chessmaster's
number.  But otherwise it is holding its own against these chessbase engines.

Time control is 10' 10 on a dual celeron 400.  CM is using 36 megs of hash.

JW



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.