Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 14:59:55 12/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
Chris, In other words, you are saying that these two programs are about equal in strength. I accept that. The folks that keep saying that "we can not know the real strength of a program until we have played at least N-hundred games" are being picayune. I know that a 500 Mile/hour rocket sled is faster than a Volkswagen just after one run. I think that you can get a good picture of a programs strength after twenty to fifty games. Both Shredder 5.0 and ChessTiger 13 are exceptional programs. Tim On December 05, 2000 at 14:33:06, Chris Taylor wrote: >A big swing to Tiger this time. These small sets of games are of no real use >when finding the *BEST* So many of the more learned people have been saying this >for a long time. Is it really possible to know the real *BEST* With such a >large swing in two sets of 9 games, i might as well toss a coin! >I wont hide my favourite. It is Rebel 11 and the Tigers. > >2nd nine >Todays results >Shredder 5 v Chess Tiger 13.0 3-6 > >S5 +2 -5 =2 >CT13 +5 -2 =2 > >I recall from yesterday a score of > >Shredder 5 v Chess Tiger 13.0 5½-3½ btw, this is from memory > >S5 +4 -2 =3 >CT13 +2 -4 =5 > >I have another 6 to play in this mini-match. > >Chris Taylor > >Ps. In the Shredder program I set the name Chess Tiger 13.0 or so I thought? >The ones posted show Opponent?? So does the next nine?? >Oh well Pobodies Nerfect!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.