Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 15:56:07 01/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 1998 at 18:50:20, Amir Ban wrote: > >Don, > >1. I'm ok with ECM98. > >2. Good to see general consensus on the data, but I think you are too >eager to throw out on the basis of "flakiness". We really can't expect >things to stabilize at ply 1, and when we have a move that is clearly >better in the longer run, we shouldn't hesitate to say it is the >solution (and to clearly say that any others are wrong). I don't know >how many of the other 81 would pass your rigid criteria ... > >3. Who's coordinating this ? I nominate Bruce on the grounds that he has >the best result so far. I'd be happy to take everyone's logs or solution charts or whatever, and delete that which we all agree is crap, at least. My editor has macros, I can do anything. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.