Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:10:51 01/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 1998 at 18:06:49, Don Dailey wrote: >Hi Bruce, > >I think we are doing the right thing. I agree we should cull the >set right away and kill the ones that we are all finding easy. >That will make it a lot easier to work with the remaining ones. >We are gradually analyzing the cooks and multiple solutions until >we are convinced we have good problems but we should probably wait >for the set to shrink first. > >I sent a list of all my "less than 10 second" problems to Bob via >email. I sent it in the orignial epd format hoping this would make >it easier for him to cull (using unix tools I assume like uniq etc.) > >I discovered that if I get rid of the "simple" ones and the "flaky" >ones (unsolves at some point) I am already left with only 302! > >You should probably email your results to Bob too in case he wants >to use them too. > >- Don > to set the stage... I made the original recommendation that we do something new, since wac has become too easy. I really don't mind beeing the "keeper" of the suite. I also don't mind if Bruce is willing. We chat by phone regularly anyway, and on ICC nearly every day, which means he can do as well as I can or better... I only want to see something that we can use for at least a few years to report/compare results...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.