Author: Severi Salminen
Date: 09:12:47 12/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2000 at 06:33:51, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >Hi, > >I think we need to see more of your code, to mee it is not clear what you are >doing. After the continue; comes your recursive search() call ? The continue goes to the next pseudo legal move and tries that. Below the continue is the normal PVS search code. >What if all moves get fpruned ? On a fprune node value needs to be at least >material_balance+ futility_margin. You need to set that before the move >generation part. Oh, yes. That is true. Now if all moves get pruned, I'm probably returning -INF+Ply which is probably very wrong...Thanks. >I also don't understand "(I prune check now also...)". You >shouldn't prune when in check at all... No, I meant that i prune if _my_ move would cause a check. I don't prune if I'm in check. I believe that one should not prune checking moves. Severi
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.