Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 10:40:43 12/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2000 at 08:52:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On December 06, 2000 at 08:25:57, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>When you this say. It is so :-)) > >its not me saying this alone. ruediger demogalle has a fast machine too >and has also good results. i have also good results on 1000 Mhz. All people which played Gandalf games with longer time controls have good results :-) >>>but gandalf is an excellent analyse tool. >>Really good comment Thorsten, you are an computer chess expert :-)) >thank you frank. :-))) >i think one has to differenciate between hardware/time-control, otherwise >gandalf looks weaker than it is other hardware. Good answere ! Yes Thorsten, the problem is that Gandalf have problems with faster time controls. Here are other programs better. The most people thinking that a top program must play good in blitz, good in active chess and good in tournament chess. I think this is not right. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.