Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 15:51:31 12/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2000 at 17:09:36, John Merlino wrote: >On December 06, 2000 at 16:51:14, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On December 06, 2000 at 00:24:32, Michael Cummings wrote: >> >>>...once I get my hands on >>>some of the more later programs and do some testing, I will be back to post how >>>CM8K is wiping butt of the other programs, which it will of course. >> >> >>Hmmm. And we can now expect your testing to be IMPARTIAL?? > >I can promise you that, given how NEGATIVELY vocal Michael was about CM7000, >that his testing will be QUITE impartial (unless the whole reason for his mood >swing is a VERY LONG periodic rate on his bi-polar disorder, coincidental with >every OTHER release of Chessmaster....) > >jm Plus its hard to lie when testing, cause 1000 other people can check your moves with the exact same programs on their own systems. I am sure that just like CM6K was winning, there were probably more supporting the other programs wanting CM6K to loose. When it was leading in a series of games against Fritz, I can recall many poeple were not liking that at all. Its very hard to make false results these days, especially when so many people can go over the moves themselves, as I stated above.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.