Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 00:47:10 12/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2000 at 13:40:43, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >Yes Thorsten, the problem is that Gandalf have problems with faster time >controls. Here are other programs better. The most people thinking that a top >program must play good in blitz, good in active chess and good in tournament >chess. I think this is not right. no - gandalf needs, as many others knowledged programs that come to my mind (mchess, cstal, older hiarcs versions before hiarcs7,...) much time. thats pretty ok. its obvious that with longer time controls it suddenly gets an elo-jump. considering that steen and dan have tuned it for positions-test-suites and 40/120 games (ssdf-time control) it gets explained why. i like gandalf, the knowledge it has is extremely good for mail-chess analysis. but when people play <60 seconds per move on old machines they get weak results. so it was with cstal and hiarcs years before. we have to differenciate to find out about the quality of something. >Best >Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.