Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: question about futility pruning and positional evaluation

Author: Ernst A. Heinz

Date: 15:39:34 12/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


>>But the effects you describe, Bob, are rather due to the
>>hash-table usage than to the pruning. They might also
>>occur if you just change your move ordering.
>
>Correct.  However, the question he asked was could futility pruning affect
>the score at the root.  The answer is yes, because of the transposition table
>problem...

No, the question asked ran as follows:

"Can sombody explain me why futility pruning tends to give
 slight positional differences?"

My answer to this still stands.

However, you have pointed out a fine detail about the
idiosyncracies of transposition tables -- namely, *their*
usage *does* indeed tend to result in differences whenever
you change *anything* in the sequence and number of nodes
visited!

Specifically, the use of transposition tables actually
also tends to lead to differences between alpha-beta and
normal minimax searches.

=Ernst=



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.