Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:56:00 12/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On December 07, 2000 at 19:30:15, Michael Cummings wrote: >On December 07, 2000 at 15:18:05, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On December 07, 2000 at 15:03:15, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On December 07, 2000 at 13:13:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On December 07, 2000 at 12:41:53, Harry Field wrote: >>>> >>>>>On December 07, 2000 at 12:18:52, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On December 07, 2000 at 06:27:10, Harry Field wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Is it important whether Mr Frohlick cares or doesn't care? What is the value of >>>>>>>Mr Frohlick's opinion? Who is he other than just some opinionated person out of >>>>>>>another six billion? >>>>>> >>>>>>Please keep yourself from reacting this way in the future. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No problem. It surprises me though that you pounce on my post and not on a very >>>>>rude posting to a person asking a question. >>>>> >>>>>Is "WHO THE &$*# CARES" in a subject line acceptable here? In my universe such a >>>>>subject line is (a) uncalled for and (b) incredibly rude. I have to say that I >>>>>do not understand the logic used. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>*** Djordje >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>PS: Your manner of writing looks familiar... >>>>> >>>>>Strange comment. Each to his own. >>>> >>>> >>>>The original comment was quite valid. Because this subject had already >>>>generated complaints and the original thread was deleted. As far as the >>>>last sentence above, I don't think it requires explanation... >>> >>> >>> >>>I think Harry is just trolling, and he might be the latest incarnation of a good >>>friend of ours. Harry's style is somewhat new paradigm, but I'm not sure it is >>>an improvement. ;) >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >> >>I know.. we have experienced a "paradigm shift". It was originally simply >>"drive into the fog". Now it is "first make a lot of fog, then drive into it." >> >>:) > >Personally, Harry Subject heading I agree with, I think Jouni is the one trying >to start a troll, whether he meant to or not. > >He could of read the other posts regarding this matter, Thats why I posted that >no one should give a summary, cause all it does is make people repeat the same >things, and the thread starts a new fight. > >Even if Harry is a past pest, he was on the right track in what he was trying to >do, but his wording can clearly be seen I took Frohlick's comment as "Gee, we have had this thread over and over. The last one was deleted by the moderators. It is primarily a tete' a tete' between two people. Do we have to have this here again? Nothing is new."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.